OOR2004REVIEWFORM.txt

# ========================================================================== #
#                                                                            #
# IF YOU PLAN TO SUBMIT YOUR REVIEW USING THIS FORM, PLEASE DO SO WITH CARE  #
# TO EASE THE AUTOMATIC PROCESSING OF YOUR REVIEW. IF YOU HAVE CO-REVIEWERS, #
# PLEASE FORWARD THE COMPLETE REVIEW FORM, MAKING SURE THAT NO LINES ARE     #
# WRAPPED.                                                                   #
# ========================================================================== #
#
# This is the offline review form for Papers of OOR 2004,
# submission 
#
# Please send the review to wuyts@iam.unibe.ch AND ducasse@iam.unibe.ch.
#
# There will be no 'physical' PC Meeting, but in case some papers get mixed
# reviews, we will have an e-mail, IRC or telephone meeting to decide.
# 
# Authors will receive responses to questions 4 and 5 only;
# responses to other questions 1-4 and 7 will NOT be sent to the authors.
#   
# The lines that MUST be in the review form are the lines that contain the
# CAPITALIZED keywords. All lines starting with the '#'-character will
# be discarded.
#
# The first keyword of a review form is REVIEWER-NAME.
# The last line of a review is the line '%%%% END OF FORM %%%%'.
#
#
# Don't change the following 3 lines:
#
REVIEWER-NAME: 
CO-REVIEWERS: 
PAPER-TITLE:
#
# 1 - How do you classify this paper FOR THE OOR WORKSHOP ? (NOT sent to the authors)
# A: I will champion this paper at the PC meeting
#    (advocate/accept).
# B: I can accept this paper, but I will not champion it
#    (accept, but could reject).
# C: This paper should be rejected, though I will not fight
#    strongly against it (reject, but could accept).
# D: Serious problems. I will argue to reject this paper
#    (detractor).
# (Fill in after the keyword: A, B, C or D)
ESUG CLASSIFICATION: 


#
# 2 - What is your overall expertise concerning the subject areas
#     of this paper? (NOT sent to the authors)
# X: I am an expert;
# Y: I am knowledgable in the area, though not an expert;
# Z: I am not an expert. My evaluation is that of an informed outsider.
# (Fill in after the keyword: X, Y or Z)
REVIEWER-EXPERTISE: 


#
# 3 - Comments for the program committee (NOT sent to the authors)
# (Type after and/or below the keyword)
COMMITTEE-COMMENTS: 


#
# 4 - Summary of the paper (sent to the authors)
# (Type after and/or below the keyword)
SUMMARY: 


#
# 5 - Evaluation of the paper, including points in favour
#     and against, and comments for improvement (sent to the authors)
# (Type after and/or below the keyword)
EVALUATION: 



%%%% END OF FORM %%%%

Last changed by admin on 21 April 2009